From 20497980b3eceae2f2dc679210a7d57b1bd0d4c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernhard Urban <lewurm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:21:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] TODO: update;  Debug: note about `printfFake'

---
 Mate/Debug.hs |  1 +
 doc/TODO      | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Mate/Debug.hs b/Mate/Debug.hs
index 8c1ca63..dc8954e 100644
--- a/Mate/Debug.hs
+++ b/Mate/Debug.hs
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ instance VarArgsFake (IO a) where
 instance (Show a, VarArgsFake r) => VarArgsFake (a -> r) where
   varFake _ _ = varFake []
 
+-- note: with -O2 GHC is able to completely optimize away such a `printfFake' call
 printfFake :: String -> (VarArgsFake t) => t
 printfFake _ = varFake []
 
diff --git a/doc/TODO b/doc/TODO
index 2e441d7..f65d294 100644
--- a/doc/TODO
+++ b/doc/TODO
@@ -19,6 +19,12 @@
 	-> depends on: exceptions, jni (?)
 	-> estimated effort: unknown
 
+(m) hoopl
+	-> for "frontEnd analysis"
+	-> transition to MIR (Mate IR)?
+
+(h) switch statement (basically lookupswitch insn)
+
 (m) testing: hunit? quickcheck? other?
 	-> we have `make tests' now, but it should be only considered as
 	   high-level test. we need something
@@ -70,6 +76,11 @@
 (l) get rid of missingh
 	-> huge dependency and we just need one function of it
 
+(l) get more details what takes time
+	-> use Data.Time.Clock
+	-> seperate analysis, jit, execution, ...
+	-> maybe use ghc profiling? (it doesn't measure native execution, but well)
+
 
 (l) ... low priority
 (m) ... medium priority
-- 
2.25.1