X-Git-Url: http://wien.tomnetworks.com/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Flib%2Fgnu%2Fjava%2Fsecurity%2FVMAccessController.java;fp=src%2Flib%2Fgnu%2Fjava%2Fsecurity%2FVMAccessController.java;h=160df10cb426b9d44980b6b8e3ba6edd2649c7e3;hb=015f0e4ccbd0f74ec2a53b06f9c0e5179da36b37;hp=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000;hpb=e2c9a51a2d10587db7f1e4e527ec4dd12b72c283;p=cacao.git diff --git a/src/lib/gnu/java/security/VMAccessController.java b/src/lib/gnu/java/security/VMAccessController.java new file mode 100644 index 000000000..160df10cb --- /dev/null +++ b/src/lib/gnu/java/security/VMAccessController.java @@ -0,0 +1,281 @@ +/* VMAccessController.java -- VM-specific access controller methods. + Copyright (C) 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + +This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify +it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) +any later version. + +This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but +WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU +General Public License for more details. + +You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +along with this program; see the file COPYING. If not, write to the +Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA +02110-1301 USA. + +Linking this library statically or dynamically with other modules is +making a combined work based on this library. Thus, the terms and +conditions of the GNU General Public License cover the whole +combination. + +As a special exception, the copyright holders of this library give you +permission to link this library with independent modules to produce an +executable, regardless of the license terms of these independent +modules, and to copy and distribute the resulting executable under +terms of your choice, provided that you also meet, for each linked +independent module, the terms and conditions of the license of that +module. An independent module is a module which is not derived from +or based on this library. If you modify this library, you may extend +this exception to your version of the library, but you are not +obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this +exception statement from your version. */ + + +package java.security; + +import java.util.HashSet; +import java.util.LinkedList; + +final class VMAccessController +{ + + // Fields. + // ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + + /** + * This is a per-thread stack of AccessControlContext objects (which can + * be null) for each call to AccessController.doPrivileged in each thread's + * call stack. We use this to remember which context object corresponds to + * which call. + */ + private static final ThreadLocal contexts = new ThreadLocal(); + + /** + * This is a Boolean that, if set, tells getContext that it has already + * been called once, allowing us to handle recursive permission checks + * caused by methods getContext calls. + */ + private static final ThreadLocal inGetContext = new ThreadLocal(); + + /** + * And we return this all-permissive context to ensure that privileged + * methods called from getContext succeed. + */ + private static final AccessControlContext DEFAULT_CONTEXT; + static + { + CodeSource source = new CodeSource(null, null); + Permissions permissions = new Permissions(); + permissions.add(new AllPermission()); + ProtectionDomain[] domain = new ProtectionDomain[] { + new ProtectionDomain(source, permissions) + }; + DEFAULT_CONTEXT = new AccessControlContext(domain); + } + + private static final boolean DEBUG = gnu.classpath.Configuration.DEBUG; + private static void debug(String msg) + { + System.err.print(">>> VMAccessController: "); + System.err.println(msg); + } + + // Constructors. + // ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + + private VMAccessController() { } + + // Class methods. + // ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + + /** + * Relate a class (which should be an instance of {@link PrivilegedAction} + * with an access control context. This method is used by {@link + * AccessController#doPrivileged(java.security.PrivilegedAction,java.security.AccessControlContext)} + * to set up the context that will be returned by {@link #getContext()}. + * This method relates the class to the current thread, so contexts + * pushed from one thread will not be available to another. + * + * @param acc The access control context. + */ + static void pushContext (AccessControlContext acc) + { + if (DEBUG) + debug("pushing " + acc); + LinkedList stack = (LinkedList) contexts.get(); + if (stack == null) + { + if (DEBUG) + debug("no stack... creating "); + stack = new LinkedList(); + contexts.set(stack); + } + stack.addFirst(acc); + } + + /** + * Removes the relation of a class to an {@link AccessControlContext}. + * This method is used by {@link AccessController} when exiting from a + * call to {@link + * AccessController#doPrivileged(java.security.PrivilegedAction,java.security.AccessControlContext)}. + */ + static void popContext() + { + if (DEBUG) + debug("popping context"); + + // Stack should never be null, nor should it be empty, if this method + // and its counterpart has been called properly. + LinkedList stack = (LinkedList) contexts.get(); + if (stack != null) + { + stack.removeFirst(); + if (stack.isEmpty()) + contexts.set(null); + } + else if (DEBUG) + { + debug("no stack during pop?????"); + } + } + + /** + * Examine the method stack of the currently running thread, and create + * an {@link AccessControlContext} filled in with the appropriate {@link + * ProtectionDomain} objects given this stack. + * + * @return The context. + */ + static AccessControlContext getContext() + { + // If we are already in getContext, but called a method that needs + // a permission check, return the all-permissive context so methods + // called from here succeed. + // + // XXX is this necessary? We should verify if there are any calls in + // the stack below this method that require permission checks. + Boolean inCall = (Boolean) inGetContext.get(); + if (inCall != null && inCall.booleanValue()) + { + if (DEBUG) + debug("already in getContext"); + return DEFAULT_CONTEXT; + } + + inGetContext.set(Boolean.TRUE); + + Object[][] stack = getStack(); + Class[] classes = (Class[]) stack[0]; + String[] methods = (String[]) stack[1]; + + if (DEBUG) + debug("got trace of length " + classes.length); + + HashSet domains = new HashSet(); + HashSet seenDomains = new HashSet(); + AccessControlContext context = null; + int privileged = 0; + + // We walk down the stack, adding each ProtectionDomain for each + // class in the call stack. If we reach a call to doPrivileged, + // we don't add any more stack frames. We skip the first three stack + // frames, since they comprise the calls to getStack, getContext, + // and AccessController.getContext. + for (int i = 3; i < classes.length && privileged < 2; i++) + { + Class clazz = classes[i]; + String method = methods[i]; + + if (DEBUG) + { + debug("checking " + clazz + "." + method); + // subject to getClassLoader RuntimePermission + debug("loader = " + clazz.getClassLoader()); + } + + // If the previous frame was a call to doPrivileged, then this is + // the last frame we look at. + if (privileged == 1) + privileged = 2; + + if (clazz.equals (AccessController.class) + && method.equals ("doPrivileged")) + { + // If there was a call to doPrivileged with a supplied context, + // return that context. If using JAAS doAs*, it should be + // a context with a SubjectDomainCombiner + LinkedList l = (LinkedList) contexts.get(); + if (l != null) + context = (AccessControlContext) l.getFirst(); + privileged = 1; + } + + // subject to getProtectionDomain RuntimePermission + ProtectionDomain domain = clazz.getProtectionDomain(); + + if (domain == null) + continue; + if (seenDomains.contains(domain)) + continue; + seenDomains.add(domain); + + // Create a static snapshot of this domain, which may change over time + // if the current policy changes. + domains.add(new ProtectionDomain(domain.getCodeSource(), + domain.getPermissions())); + } + + if (DEBUG) + debug("created domains: " + domains); + + ProtectionDomain[] result = (ProtectionDomain[]) + domains.toArray(new ProtectionDomain[domains.size()]); + + if (context != null) + { + DomainCombiner dc = context.getDomainCombiner (); + // If the supplied context had no explicit DomainCombiner, use + // our private version, which computes the intersection of the + // context's domains with the derived set. + if (dc == null) + context = new AccessControlContext + (IntersectingDomainCombiner.SINGLETON.combine + (result, context.getProtectionDomains ())); + // Use the supplied DomainCombiner. This should be secure, + // because only trusted code may create an + // AccessControlContext with a custom DomainCombiner. + else + context = new AccessControlContext (result, context, dc); + } + // No context was supplied. Return the derived one. + else + context = new AccessControlContext (result); + + inGetContext.set(Boolean.FALSE); + return context; + } + + /** + * Returns a snapshot of the current call stack as a pair of arrays: + * the first an array of classes in the call stack, the second an array + * of strings containing the method names in the call stack. The two + * arrays match up, meaning that method i is declared in class + * i. The arrays are clean; it will only contain Java methods, + * and no element of the list should be null. + * + *

The default implementation returns an empty stack, which will be + * interpreted as having no permissions whatsoever. + * + * @return A pair of arrays describing the current call stack. The first + * element is an array of Class objects, and the second is an array + * of Strings comprising the method names. + */ +// private static Object[][] getStack() +// { +// return new Object[][] { new Class[0], new String[0] }; +// } + private native static Object[][] getStack(); +}