2003-02-16 Daniel Morgan <danmorg@sc.rr.com>

[mono.git] / mcs / errors / fail

diff --git a/mcs/errors/fail b/mcs/errors/fail
index c35aec3be609ee80f9a4c7608602baad9a7be859..7ff0429db42b4d44494b9587ea7ece0ddbb2587a 100755 (executable)
--- a/mcs/errors/fail
+++ b/mcs/errors/fail
@@ -1,70 +1,30 @@
 The following tests failed: 
 
-cs0051.cs, cs0060.cs, cs0111.cs
-
+cs0051.cs: We don't complain about inconsistent accessibility.
+cs0060.cs: We don't complain about inconsistent accessibility.
 cs0108.cs: We should re-enable the test code in the compiler
 cs0110.cs: Stack overflow in the compiler
-
-cs0118.cs:
-       We report the error, but the CSC error gives more information.
-
-cs0121.cs: Function deambiguator does not work here
-cs0136-2.cs cs0136.cs: Similar error reported (reuse of variable name, 128)
-cs0157.cs: Internal compiler error (null pointer reference)
+cs0111.cs: We don't complain about second occurance of method definition.
+cs0118.cs: We report the error, but the CSC error gives more information.
+cs0136.cs: Similar error reported (reuse of variable name, 128)
+cs0136-2.cs: Similar error reported (reuse of variable name, 128)
 cs0164.cs: We dont emit the warning for an unused label
-cs0165-2.cs cs0165.cs:
-       We need data flow analysis
-
-cs0169.cs:
-       We do not track usage of private fields (missing warning)
-
-cs0171.cs 
-       We do not track unassigned readonly fields.
-
-cs0216.cs:
-       We do not report missing operators.
-
-cs0234.cs:
-       Will be hard to fix;
-
-cs0246.cs:
-       Compiler crashes
-
-cs0534.cs:
-       This is bad.  We were supposed to catch this
-
-cs0563.cs:
-       Parser error.  This is bad.
-
-cs0646.cs:
-       Compiler crashes
-
-cs0649.cs:
-       Just a warning on private field usage.
-
-cs0654.cs:
-       Compiler crash
-
-cs1001.cs:
-       Compiler emits syntax error;  Its ok.
-
-cs1501.cs:
-       Compiler crashes.  Easy to fix
-
-cs1513.cs:
-       Syntax error;  We could provide better message
-
-cs1518.cs:
-       Syntax error;  We could provide better message
-
-cs1525.cs:
-       Syntax error;  We could provide better message
-
-cs1528.cs:
-       Syntax error;  We could provide better message
-
-cs1529.cs: 
-       Syntax error;  We could provide better message
+cs0165.cs: We need data flow analysis
+cs0165-2.cs: We need data flow analysis
+cs0171.cs: We do not track unassigned struct fields on struct constructors 
+cs0216.cs: We do not report missing operators.
+cs0234.cs: Will be hard to fix;
+cs0255.cs: Error isn't flagged.
+cs0523.cs: Error isn't flagged.
+cs0529.cs: We get error CS0146 instead
+cs0654.cs: Compiler crash
+cs1001.cs: Compiler emits syntax error;  Its ok.
+cs1513.cs: Syntax error;  We could provide better message
+cs1518.cs: Syntax error;  We could provide better message
+cs1525.cs: Syntax error;  We could provide better message
+cs1528.cs: Syntax error;  We could provide better message
+cs1529.cs: Syntax error;  We could provide better message
+cs1552.cs: Syntax error;  We could provide better message
+cs1604.cs: Error isn't flagged.
+cs-20.cs: Attribute error isn't flagged
 
-cs1552.cs:
-       Syntax error;  We could provide better message