implement various technologies developed by Microsoft that have now
been submitted to the ECMA for standardization.
+ The Mono project has also sparked a lot of interest in developing
+ C#-based components, libraries and frameworks. Today Mono is not
+ limited to implement the .NET Framework, but also contains other
+ components. Some of the components of the Mono platform were
+ developed by the Mono team, and some others we have incorporated
+ from other open source efforts, the most important ones:
+
+ <ul>
+ <li><a
+ href="http://remoting-corba.sourceforge.net/">Remoting.CORBA</a>: A
+ CORBA implementation for Mono.
+
+ <li>Ginzu: An implementation on top of Remoting for the <a
+ href="http://www.zeroc.com">ICE</a> stack
+
+ <li><a href="http://gtk-sharp.sf.net">Gtk#</a>: Bindings for
+ the popular Gtk+ GUI toolkit for Unix and Windows systems.
+ Other bindings are available: Diacanvas-Sharp and MrProject.
+
+ <li><a
+ href="http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/Default.aspx">#ZipLib</a>:
+ A library to manipulate various kinds of compressed files and
+ archives (Zip and tar).
+
+ <li>GlGen (available from the Mono CVS): Bindings for OpenGL.
+
+ <li>Mono.LDAP: LDAP access for .NET apps.
+
+ <li>Mono.Data: We ship support for Postgress, MySql, Sybase,
+ DB2, SqlLite, Tds (SQL server protocol) and Oracle databases.
+
+ <li>Mono.Cairo: Bindings for the <a
+ href="http://www.cairographics.org">Cairo</a> rendering
+ engine (Our System.Drawing is implemented on top of this).
+
+ <li>Mono.Posix: Bindings for building POSIX applications using
+ C#.
+
+ <li>Mono.Http: Support for creating custom, embedded HTTP
+ servers and common HTTP handlers for your applications.
+ </ul>
+
Q: What is the difference between Mono and the .NET Initiative?
A: The ".NET Initiative" is a somewhat nebulous company-wide effort by
compiler, and a garbage collecting runtime.
* A class library that can work with any language
- which works on the CLR.
+ which works on the CLR. Both .NET compatible class
+ libraries as well as Mono-provided class libraries
+ are included.
* A compiler for the C# language. In the future we
might work on other compilers that target the Common
Other higher level class libraries (ASP.NET, ADO.NET, WinForms) will
be released when they become stable.
+Q: When will Mono 1.0 ship?
+
+A: We are planning on releasing Mono 1.0 (Mono Core) which will ship all the
+ components of Mono that are known to be stable in Q4 2003/Q1 2004.
+
+ This release will lack System.Windows.Forms and
+ Enterprise.Services, as they will not be production ready on this timeframe.
+
+ Mono 1.2 should come in Q2 2004 and include the missing components
+ libraries that will make Mono feature-compatible with .NET 1.0
+
Q: What major components will you include in Mono?
A: Hopefully everything that Microsoft ships on their Framework
Win32 message loop. In order to maintain compatibility, Wine must be used,
and this is being done; see the
<a href="/winforms.html">System.Windows.Forms effort page</a>.
-
- Additionally, Wine apps don't currently fit in -- visually -- with
- Gtk+ or Qt apps.
+
+Q: Wine applications do not look like native applications, what are
+ you going to do about this?
+
+A: We have already a few patches into our version of Windows.Forms
+ that makes Wine use the colors and font settings from your desktop,
+ improving the integration a lot. In the future, we will continue
+ to improve this interoperability scenario.
Q: Will I be able to run my smart clients on systems powered by Mono?
date yet. The current approach is using the Wine Library to implement
it.
+Q: Do you have a comparission chart about the various toolkit
+ offerings?
+
+A: A document explaining this is available at: <a
+ href="http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/toolkits.html">http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/toolkits.html</a>.
+
<a name="msft"></a>
** Mono and Microsoft
produced with the Mono tools. The only thing you will need is a
just-in-time compiler (JIT).
-Q: What is a 100% .NET application?
-
-A: A `100% .NET application' is one that only uses the APIs defined
- under the System namespace and does not use PInvoke. These
- applications would in theory run unmodified on Windows, Linux,
- HP-UX, Solaris, MacOS X and others.
-
Q: If Microsoft will release a port of their .NET platform under the
`Shared Source' license, why should I bother with anything else?
learn more about running Windows applications on Intel Unix systems
refer to <a href="http://www.winehq.com">the Wine Project</a>.
-Q: Will I be able to compile a Microsoft VB.NET application and execute
- the resultant MSIL file under MONO on Linux without converting to C#
- and recompiling?
-
-A: Once we have a complete VisualBasic runtime, yes.
-
Q: Can mono run the WebMatrix?
A: No. That requires System.Windows.Forms support which is not
Win32 libs. This is achieved by inserting -lunimono before
-lkerner32/user32 in the linker's specs file.
+Q: Why support Windows, when you can run the real thing?
+
+A: There are various reasons:
+
+ <ul>
+ <li> About half the contributors to Mono are Windows developers.
+ They have many different for contributing to the effort, and
+ we find it very important to let those developers run the runtime on Windows without forcing
+ them to use a new operating system.
+
+ <li> Supporting Windows helps us identify the portable portions
+ of Mono from the non-portable versions of it, helping Mono
+ become more portable in the future.
+
+ <li> Mono does not heavily modify the windows registry, update system DLLs,
+ install DLLs to the Windows/System32 path. Another words, I knew Mono would
+ not cause any legacy enterprise applications to stop working - and it
+ hasn't. However, our CIO er is againt it because of the changes that would
+ be made to Windows 2000, such as, affecting security.
+ </ul>
+
<a name="compatibility"></a>
** Compatibility
-Q: Can Mono run applications developed with the Microsoft.NET fraemwork?
+Q: Can Mono run applications developed with the Microsoft.NET framework?
-A: Yes, Mono can run applications developed with the Microsft .NET Framework
+A: Yes, Mono can run applications developed with the Microsoft .NET Framework
on Unix. There are a few caveats to keep in mind: Mono has not
been completed yet, so a few API calls might be missing; And in
some cases the Mono behavior *might* be incorrect.
Win32 API calls, or assume certain patterns that are not correct
for cross-platform applications.
+Q: What is a 100% .NET application?
+
+A: A `100% .NET application' is one that only uses the APIs defined
+ under the System namespace and does not use P/Invoke. These
+ applications would in theory run unmodified on Windows, Linux,
+ HP-UX, Solaris, MacOS X and others.
+
+ Note that this requirement also holds for all assemblies used by the
+ application. If one of them is Windows-specific, then the entire program
+ is not a 100% .NET application.
+
+ Furthermore, a 100% .NET application must not contain non-standard data
+ streams in the assembly. For example, Visual Studio .NET will insert a
+ <tt>#-</tt> stream into assemblies built under the "Debug" target.
+ This stream contains debugging information for use by Visual Studio .NET;
+ however, this stream can not be interpreted by Mono (unless you're willing
+ to donate support).
+
+ Thus, it is recommended that all Visual Studio .NET-compiled code be
+ compiled under the Release target before it is executed under Mono.
+
+Q: Can I execute my Visual Studio .NET program (Visual Basic .NET, Visual C#,
+ Managed Extensions for C++, etc.) under Mono?
+
+A: Yes, with some reservations.
+
+ The .NET program must either be a 100% .NET application, or (somehow) have
+ all dependent assemblies available on all desired platforms. (How to do so
+ is outside the bounds of this FAQ.)
+
+ For example, since Mono's System.Windows.Forms implementation will use
+ Wine, System.Windows.Forms is only as portable as Wine is. It's possible
+ that Mono may run on a platform, but Wine will not, in which case a
+ System.Windows.Forms app will not run on that platform. This is similarly
+ true for all assemblies that are not 100% managed code.
+
+ Mono must also have an implementation for the .NET assemblies used. For
+ example the System.EnterpriseServices namespace is part of .NET, but it
+ has not been implemented in Mono. Thus, any applications using this
+ namespace will not run under Mono.
+
+ With regards to languages, C# applications tend to be most portable.
+
+ Visual Basic .NET applications are portable, but Mono's
+ Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll implementation is incomplete. It is recommended
+ to either avoid using this assembly in your own code, only use the
+ portions that Mono has implemented, or to help implement the missing
+ features. Additionally, you can set 'Option Strict On', which
+ eliminates the implicit calls to the unimplemented
+ Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.ObjectType class.
+ (Thanks to Jörg Rosenkranz.)
+
+ Managed Extensions for C++ is least likely to operate under Mono. Mono
+ does not support mixed mode assemblies (that is, assemblies containing both
+ managed and unmanaged code, which Managed C++ can produce). You need a
+ fully-managed assembly to run under Mono, and getting the Visual C++ .NET
+ compiler to generate such an executable can be difficult. You need to use
+ only the .NET-framework assemblies, not the C libraries (you can't use
+ <b>printf</b>(3) for example.), and you need to use
+ the linker options <tt>/nodefaultlib /entry:main mscoree.lib</tt> in
+ addition to the <tt>/clr</tt> compiler flag. You can still use certain
+ compiler intrinsic functions (such as <b>memcpy</b>(3)) and the STL.
+ You should also see <a
+ href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vcmex/html/vcgrfconvertingmanagedextensionsforcprojectsfrommixed-modetopureil.asp"
+ >Converting Managed Extensions for C++ Projects from Mixed Mode to Pure
+ Intermediate Language</a> at MSDN.
+ Finally, you can use PEVERIFY.EXE from the .NET SDK to determine if the
+ assembly is fully managed.
+
+ Thanks to Serge Chaban for the linker flags to use.
+
<a name="pnpproject"></a>
** Mono and Portable.NET
initially using the Microsoft implementation of the CLI and then
executed later with Mono.
+ We are recommending people to use and contribute to existing
+ projects like SharpDevelop, Anjuta and Eclipse.
+
Q: What kind of rules make the Common Intermediate Language useful for
JITers?
Pages" technology so as they are very different things, they don't
conflict.
-Q: What about using something like Jabber instead of the System.Messaging
- namespace?.
-
-A: In short, MSMQ is not something like Jabber, but asynchronous messaging
- through queues. Useful queues do more than serialize messages, they are
- also platform bridges.
-
-Q: Are you supporting XMLDocument and relatives?.
-
-A: Currently, we aren't implementing them yet. It would require updates to
- most of the XmlNode derivatives so it's not a trivial task. We are
- currently focusing on getting XPath support working.
-
Q: Is there any plan to develop an aspx server for Mono?.
-A: The web server turned out to be very simple compared to the rest of the
- work. Gonzalo has got the page generator mostly done (a module called
- xsp, who has nothing to do with the XSP term used in the Apache Project).
- Patrik has done a lot of the work to get the ProcessRequest to work.
- You can try to help in the final touches to the System.Web classes and
- writing regression tests for the widgets we have.
+A: The XSP reference server is available and you can also use mod_mono
+ with Apache.
Q: Is there any way I can develop the class libraries using Linux yet?
-A: Yes. Some class libraries can be developed on Linux. Search for
- Paolo's post (he lists which classes can be compiled fine now).
+A: Yes. Mono has been self hosting since May 2002.
Q: Is there any way I can install a known working copy of mono in /usr,
and an experimental copy somewhere else, and have both copies use
A: We rename corlib to mscorlib also when saving the PE files, in fact,
the runtime can execute program created by mono just fine.
-Q: Is there a relatively straightforward way to repeat the steps taken
- by Paolo to get Mono completely self-hosted on Linux?
-
-A: To build the compiler and class libraries in Linux, run:
- <ul><li>make -f makefile.gnu. To install them, run: </li>
- <li>make -f makefile.gnu install prefix=/opt/mono</li>
- </ul>
-
- If you want to produce and distribute a monocharge tarball, run:
- make -f makefile.gnu dist
- Of course you have to run these in the top level mcs directory.
-
Q: Is it possible to build a C# file to some sort of intermediate format which
can linked into a final module, like the traditional .c -> .o -> .so path?
-A: You could do: mcs /target:module file1.cs, mcs /target:module file2.cs,
- mcs /target:exe file1.dll file2.dll /out:mybin.exe
+A: You can use:
-Q: Is there any plans for implementing remoting in the near future?, When will
- work in System.Runtime.Remoting.dll start?
+ mcs /target:library file1.cs, mcs /target:library file2.cs,
+ mcs /target:exe file1.dll file2.dll /out:mybin.exe
+
+Q: Is there any plans for implementing remoting in the near future?
A: The remoting infrastructure is in place. We have implementations
of the TcpChannel, HttpChannel and the Soap and Binary Formatters.
Q: I want to be able to execute Mono binaries, without having to use the "mono"
command. How can I do this?
-A: From Carlos Perelló:
+A: From Carlos Perelló:
<i>I think that the best solution is the binfmt feature with the
wrapper that exists with Debian packages at:
This way you just execute: ./my-cool-mono-application.exe and it works
without the need of any wrapper.</i>
+Q: I see funny characters when I run programs, what is the problem?
+
+A: (From Peter Williams and Gonzalo Paniagua):
+
+ This is Red Hat 9 (probably) using UTF8 on its console; the bytes are
+ the UTF8 endianness markers. You can do:
+
+ LC_ALL=C mono myexe.exe
+
+ And they wont show up.
+
+ Alternatively, you can do:
+
+ $ echo -e "\033%G"
+
+ to enable UTF-8 on the console.
+
<a name="asp">
** Mono and ASP.NET
Q: Can I run Apache 1 and Apache 2 on the same machine?
- You can always keep a copy of Apache 2 running in paralell with your Apache
+ You can always keep a copy of Apache 2 running in parallel with your Apache
1.3 (either different port or using a reverse proxy).
You can also bind the two servers to different IP addresses on the
Q: What do I need to watch out for when programming in VB.NET so that I'm
sure to be able to run those apps on Linux?
-A: Not making any PInvoke or DLL calls should and not using anything in
+A: Not making any P/Invoke or DLL calls should and not using anything in
the Microsoft.* namespaces should suffice. Also do not use any
Methods/Classes marked as "This type/method supports the .NET Framework
infrastructure and is not intended to be used directly from your code."
The Mono strategy for dealing with these technologies is as
follows: (1) work around the patent by using a different
- implementation techinque that retains the API, but changes the
+ implementation technique that retains the API, but changes the
mechanism; if that is not possible, we would (2) remove the pieces
of code that were covered by those patents, and also (3) find prior
art that would render the patent useless.
components, and things that we have developed (like Gtk#) or Apache
integration.
+Q: Is Mono only an implementation of the .NET Framework?
+
+A: Mono implements both the .NET Framework, as well as plenty of class
+ libraries that are either Unix specific, <a
+ href="http://www.gnome.org">Gnome</a> specific, or that are not
+ part of the .NET Framework but people find useful.
+
+ The following map shows the relationship between the components:
+
+ <img src="http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/tmp/map.png">
+
<a name="etc"></a>
** Miscellaneous Questions
or if you think that you found a bug, etc. Please visit the
<a href="http://geneura.ugr.es/~jaime/deploy/mono-common-problems.html">Mono Common Problems</a> document and try there.
+** Credits
+
+ The FAQ contains material contributed by Miguel de Icaza, Jaime Anguiano, Lluis Sánchez.
projects / mono.git / blobdiff