<a href="#msft">Mono and Microsoft</a><br>
<a href="#pnpproject">Mono and the Portable.NET Project</a><br>
<a href="#webservices">Web Services</a><br>
+<a href="#asp">Mono and ASP.NET</a><br>
+<a href="#ado">Mono and ADO.NET</a><br>
<a href="#devel">Development Tools and Issues</a><br>
<a href="#java">Mono and Java</a><br>
<a href="#extending">Extending Mono</a><br>
<a href="#licensing">Licensing</a><br>
<a href="#patents">Patents</a><br>
<a href="#etc">Miscellaneous Questions</a><br>
+<a href="#problems">Mono Common Problems</a><br>
+A <a
+href="http://www.es.gnome.org/documentacion/articulos/mono-puf/mono-puf/">Spanish
+translation</a> is also available
<a name="basics"></a>
** Basics
Q: What is Mono exactly?
A: The Mono Project is an open development initiative sponsored by
- Ximian that is working to develop an open source, Linux-based
+ Ximian that is working to develop an open source, Unix
version of the Microsoft .NET development platform. Its objective
- is to enable Linux developers to build and
+ is to enable Unix developers to build and
deploy cross-platform .NET Applications. The project will
implement various technologies developed by Microsoft that have now
been submitted to the ECMA for standardization.
framework. Mono is an implementation of the development framework,
but not an implementation of anything else related to the .NET
Initiative, such as Passport, software-as-a-service, or
- corporate rebranding.
+ corporate re-branding.
Q: What technologies are included in Mono?
Windows has compilers that target the virtual machine from <a
href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/net/thirdparty/default.asp#lang">a
number of languages:</a> Managed C++, Java Script, Eiffel,
- Component Pascal, APL, Cobol, Oberon, Perl, Python, Scheme,
+ Component Pascal, APL, Cobol, Perl, Python, Scheme,
Smalltalk, Standard ML, Haskell, Mercury and Oberon.
The CLR and the Common Type System (CTS) enables applications and
Q: Will you offer an ECMA-compliant set of class libraries?
-A: Eventually we will. Our current focus is on interoperating
+A: Eventually we will. Our current focus is on inter-operating
with the Microsoft SDK, but we will also offer an ECMA compliant
set of libraries.
A: The JIT engine is usable on Intel x86 machines. An interpreter
can be used on other non-Intel x86 machines.
- The class libraries are not yet mature enough to run real applications,
- but if you are interested in trying out Mono, you can definetly start
- testing things out as many programs run.
-
- The C# compiler has made significant progress, it can even compile
- itself now, but it can not yet be ran with our class libraries as
- they are missing some features.
+ The class libraries are mature enough to run some real applications
+ (the compiler for instance, and every day more and more applications
+ are natively developed with Mono).
Q: When will you ship it?
-A: It is premature to target a shipdate for the code, but we
- anticipate that it will be available some time in the middle of
- 2002.
+A: Different parts of Mono will achieve usability at different stages,
+ once we are comfortable with the compiler, we will release "Mono Core",
+ which contains everything needed to develop applications with the base
+ class libraries. This should be available at some point during 2002.
+
+ Other higher level class libraries (ASP.NET, ADO.NET) will
+ be released when they become stable.
+
+Q: What major components will you include in Mono?
+
+A: Hopefully everything that Microsoft ships on their Framework
+ (ADO.NET, ASP.NET), and
+ we encourage third party developers to create reusable components that
+ work on both Mono and Windows.
Q: How can I contribute?
Project white paper</a>.
the project.
+Q: Miguel said once that Mono was being implemented in COBOL. Is that true?.
+
+A: No. It was a joke.
+
<a name="ximian"></a>
A: When Mono is ready to be shipped Ximian will offer a commercial
support and services for Mono.
+Q: Does Ximian provide consulting services around Mono?
+
+A: Yes, Ximian does provide consulting services around Mono to
+ make it suitable to your needs. Porting the runtime engine,
+ customizing it, working on specific classes or tuning the code
+ for your particular needs.
+
Q: Will you wait until Mono is finished?
A: Mono will ship on various stages as they mature. Some people
require only a subset of the technologies, those will ship first.
More advanced features will take more time to develop. A support
- timeline will be available in June 2002.
+ time line will be available in June 2002.
<a name="gnome"></a>
** Mono and GNOME
We encourage GNOME developers to continue using the existing tools,
libraries and components. Improvements made to GNOME will have an
- impact on Mono, as they would be the "backend" for various classes.
+ impact on Mono, as they would be the "back-end" for various classes.
Q: Will Mono include compatibility with Bonobo components? What is the
relationship between Mono and Bonobo?
A: Yes, we will enable people to write GNOME applications using Mono.
+Q: Do you have C# bindings for GNOME?.
+
+A: Yes, we currently bind libgnome, libgnomecanvas, and libgnomeui --
+ although I dare say I have no idea how functional the bindings are
+ outside of what I tested in the sample app. I imagine other libraries
+ under the GNOME framework will be added on an as-needed (and as-requested)
+ basis...although a truly good bonobo binding will have to wait on the CORBA
+ remoting support which has been started recently.
+
<a name="gui"></a>
** GUI applications
of P/Invoke to call Win32 functions, your smart client applications
will run on Mono platforms.
+Q: Where can I learn more about Gtk#?
+
+A: The following <a href="http://gtk-sharp.sourceforge.net>link</a> sends you to the page of the project.
+
+Q: What can I do with Gtk#?.
+
+A: Gtk# is becoming very usable and you can create applications and
+ applets like those you see in a GNOME desktop environment. It's
+ easy to install so it's worth a try.
+
+Q: How can I compile my HelloWorld.cs which uses Gtk#?.
+
+A: Try: mcs --unsafe -o HelloWorld.exe -r glib-sharp -r pango-sharp -r
+ atk-sharp -r gdk-sharp -r gtk-sharp -r gdk-imaging-sharp
+ HelloWorld.cs
+
+Q: Is there any way how to connect DataAdapter to some GTK# controls?
+
+A: There is a sample file called `DbClient' in gtk-sharp/samples that you
+ might to look at. It is a sample program in Gtk# that adds/updates/deletes
+ information on a Postgress database. When we have the new table/tree widgets,
+ I am sure someone would write an adapter for System.Data (in Gtk2 the
+ tree/list widgets are written using a view/model, so you only need to write
+ a model that maps to the database). You can have a look at
+ gtk-sharp/sample/DbClient, where there is a GTK# application that uses
+ System.Data. It does not use DataAdapter, but DataReader though.
+
+Q: Do you have an estimate for when Windows.Forms will be released?
+
+A: We do not know, volunteers are working on this, but there is no set
+ date yet. The current approach is using the Wine Library to implement
+ it.
+
<a name="msft"></a>
** Mono and Microsoft
A: No. Microsoft proved with the CLI and the C# language that it was
possible to create a powerful foundation for many languages to
- interoperate. We will always have that.
+ inter-operate. We will always have that.
Even if changes happened in the platform which were undocumented,
the existing platform would a value on its own.
learn more about running Windows applications on Intel Unix systems
refer to <a href="http://www.winehq.com">the Wine Project</a>.
+Q: Will I be able to compile a Microsoft VB.NET application and execute
+ the resultant MSIL file under MONO on Linux without converting to C#
+ and recompiling?
+
+A: Once we have a complete VisualBasic runtime, yes.
+
+Q: Can mono run the WebMatrix?
+
+A: No. That requires System.Windows.Forms support which is not
+ currently implemented.
+
+Q: Does mono have something like Passport?
+ Will mono have a server side Passport/Similar framework for XSP as well as client classes?
+
+A: Not yet, but the client side API for authentication is not the problem.
+ We will likely have a lot of other authentication APIs, like the Liberty
+ Alliance APIs. The problem is people on the web provider end that might use
+ this for authentication.
+
<a name="pnpproject"></a>
** Mono and Portable.NET
A: Most of Mono is being written using C#, with only
a few parts written in C (The JIT engine, the runtime, the
- interfaces to the garbage collection system). The Portable.NET
- Project is using C for development.
+ interfaces to the garbage collection system).
+
+ It is easier to describe what is unique about Mono:
+ <ul>
+ <li> A self-hosting C# compiler written in C#, which is clean, easy
+ to maintain.
+
+ <li> A multi-platform runtime engine: both a JIT engine and an
+ interpreter exist. The JIT engine runs currently on x86
+ systems, while the interpreter works on SPARC, StrongARM and
+ PowerPC systems.
+
+ <li> Supports Linux, Windows and Solaris at this point.
+
+ <li> The JIT engine is written using a portable instruction
+ selector which not only generates good code (we are told
+ that we are faster than Rotor, but it is hard to tell) but
+ is also the foundation to re-target the JIT engine to other
+ systems.
+
+ The system employed is described in various compiler
+ books and it is very similar to what is described in the
+ book that covers LCC, the ANSI C retargetable C compiler.
+
+ <li> The JIT engine supports in-lining, constant folding and propagation,
+
+ <li> Full support for remoting in the runtime, but the class
+ libraries are still behind.
+
+ <li> The C# compiler, the JIT engine and the class libraries are
+ mature enough that the whole system is self-hosting. This means that
+ we develop Mono completely with itself at this point.
+
+ <li> We are not yet done, and there is a lot of work left to be
+ done
+
+ <li> We have a great community of developers, without which Mono
+ would not be possible.
+
+ <li> We will provide an ahead of time compilation mode in the
+ future.
+ </ul>
<a name="webservices"></a>
** Web Services
Q: Can I author Web Services with Mono?
A: You will be able to write Web Services on .NET that run on Mono and
- viceversa.
+ vice-versa.
Q: If Mono implements the SDK classes, will I be able to write and
execute .NET Web Services with it?
exposing it to other RPC systems (like CORBA) is really simple, and
does not even require support from an object.
- We will be implementing CORBA interoperation as an extension to the
+ We will be implementing CORBA inter-operation as an extension to the
Mono classes so that we can integrate with Bonobo, just like
- Microsoft provides COM interoperation classes and support
+ Microsoft provides COM inter-operation classes and support
mechanisms.
Q: Can I serialize my objects to other things other than XML?
<a name="devel"></a>
** Development Tools and Issues
-Q: Will it be possible to use the CLI features without using bytecodes
+Q: Will it be possible to use the CLI features without using byte codes
or the JIT?
A: Yes. The CLI engine will be made available as a shared library.
The garbage collection engine, the threading abstraction, the
object system, the dynamic type code system and the JIT will be
- available for C developers to integreate with their applications if
+ available for C developers to integrate with their applications if
they wish to do so.
Q: Will you have new development tools?
can interpret them as trivially as you can interpret JVM byte
codes.
+Q: Isn't it a little bit confusing to have the name of "XSP" (the same
+ as in the Apache Project) for the ASP.NET support in Mono?.
+
+A: In Mono, xsp is just the name of the C# code generator for ASP.NET
+ pages. In the Apache Project, it is a term for the "eXtensible Server
+ Pages" technology so as they are very different things, they don't
+ conflict.
+
+Q: What about using something like Jabber instead of the System.Messaging
+ namespace?.
+
+A: In short, MSMQ is not something like Jabber, but asynchronous messaging
+ through queues. Useful queues do more than serialize messages, they are
+ also platform bridges.
+
+Q: Are you supporting XMLDocument and relatives?.
+
+A: Currently, we aren't implementing them yet. It would require updates to
+ most of the XmlNode derivatives so it's not a trivial task. We are
+ currently focusing on getting XPath support working.
+
+Q: Is there any plan to develop an aspx server for Mono?.
+
+A: The web server turned out to be very simple compared to the rest of the
+ work. Gonzalo has got the page generator mostly done (a module called
+ xsp, who has nothing to do with the XSP term used in the Apache Project).
+ Patrik has done a lot of the work to get the ProcessRequest to work.
+ You can try to help in the final touches to the System.Web classes and
+ writing regression tests for the widgets we have.
+
+Q: Is there any way I can develop the class libraries using Linux yet?
+
+A: Yes. Some class libraries can be developed on Linux. Search for
+ Paolo's post (he lists which classes can be compiled fine now).
+
+Q: Is there any way I can install a known working copy of mono in /usr,
+ and an experimental copy somewhere else, and have both copies use
+ their own libraries? (I'm still not very good at library paths in
+ Linux)
+
+A: Yes. Just use two installation prefixes.
+
+Q: How should I write tests or a tests suite?
+
+A: If you do a test suite for C#, you might want to keep it
+ independent of the Mono C# compiler, so that other compiler
+ implementations can later use it.
+
+Q: Would it be too terrible to have another corlib signed as mscorlib?
+
+A: We rename corlib to mscorlib also when saving the PE files, in fact,
+ the runtime can execute program created by mono just fine.
+
+Q: Is there a relatively straightforward way to repeat the steps taken
+ by Paolo to get Mono completely self-hosted on Linux?
+
+A: To build the compiler and class libraries in Linux, run:
+ <ul><li>make -f makefile.gnu. To install them, run: </li>
+ <li>make -f makefile.gnu install prefix=/opt/mono</li>
+ </ul>
+
+ If you want to produce and distribute a monocharge tarball, run:
+ make -f makefile.gnu dist
+ Of course you have to run these in the top level mcs directory.
+
+Q: Is it possible to build a C# file to some sort of intermediate format which
+ can linked into a final module, like the traditional .c -> .o -> .so path?
+
+A: You could do: mcs /target:module file1.cs, mcs /target:module file2.cs,
+ mcs /target:exe file1.dll file2.dll /out:mybin.exe
+
+Q: Is there any plans for implementing remoting in the near future?, When will
+ work in System.Runtime.Remoting.dll start?
+
+A: The remoting infrastructure is in place. Some of the channels and
+ formatters are not.
+
+Q: I'm wondering if there are any plans to start using nant to build the
+ class lib + test lib. i think that every project need/should use an
+ automated build process and nant + a couple of tools enables this. is
+ the problem that the compiler can't run nant yet?
+
+A: Maybe well be doing some sort of automated build process + testing when
+ the summer finish.
+
+<a name="asp">
+** Mono and ASP.NET
+
+Q: Is Mono supporting ASP.NET?
+
+A: Yes. The development of the support for ASP.NET comes in various stages,
+ here is what Gonzalo has been working on: 1. The Parser. 2. Getting the
+ parser to generate output compatible with ASP.NET. 3. Running the sample
+ output with the real Microsoft runtime but using our generated page. 4.
+ Running the sample with our classes with the .NET runtime. 5. Running
+ our sample code with our classes with our runtime. This is the process
+ we are following. Currently Gonzalo has reached point 5.
+
+Q: Do I need install cygwin to work on ASP.NET in mono or Linux is enough since
+ it is self host right now.
+
+A: Linux is enough.
+
+Q: Any plan to make ASP.NET in mono works with Apache in Linux?.
+
+A: Yes, we have plans to do so, but we need to wait for Patrik's patches to
+ HttpRuntime. Once that is there, writing a mod_mono should be trivial
+ (look at mono/samples/embed for a sample embedded application).
+
+<a name="ado">
+** Mono and ADO.NET
+
+Q: What is the status of ADO.NET support?. Could I start migrating
+ applications from MS.NET to Mono?.
+
+A: You could start right now using the ADO.NET support in mono, of course,
+ if you want to help filling the missing gaps while you develop your app
+ :-) Well, what I mean is that we're not that far to having full ADO.NET
+ support in Mono, and we've got a lot of working things, so if we could
+ get more help, we'd finish it really soon :-)
+
+Q: In developing the data architecture for the application are there and
+ objects I should stay away from in order to insure the smoothest possible
+ transition (minimum code rewrite) to Mono's ADO.NET implementation? (For
+ example, strongly typed datasets versus untyped datasets, etc...)
+
+A: We are implementing all the classes in Microsoft .NET's System.Data, so
+ you can be sure that things will work the same in Mono as with the Microsoft
+ implementation.
+
<a name="java">
** Mono and Java
A: You can get very good tools for doing Java development on free
systems right now. <a href="http://www.redhat.com">Red Hat</a> has
contributed a <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org">GCC</a> <a
- href="http://gcc.gnu.org/java">frontend for Java</a> that can take
+ href="http://gcc.gnu.org/java">front-end for Java</a> that can take
Java sources or Java byte codes and generate native executables; <a
href="http://www.transvirtual.com">Transvirtual</a> has implemented
<a href="http://www.kaffe.org">Kaffe</a> a JIT engine for Java;
href="ideas.html#guavac">project</a> that someone could take on to
make this happen.
- Microsoft has an implemenation of the Java language called J# that
+ Microsoft has an implementation of the Java language called J# that
can target the CIL execution engine.
-Q: Is it possible to write a JVM byte code to CIL convertor?
+Q: Is it possible to write a JVM byte code to CIL converter?
A: Yes, it is possible. Here are a few starting point:
be translated into the equivalent "meaning" in CLR-land.
</ul>
+Q: Could mono become a hybrid CIL/java platform?
+
+A: No. It is quite far from the philosophy of the project. The idea of Mono
+ is, to have only _one_ VM, on which all can run. And if there existing a
+ binary-converter from Java-.class to IL and if there existing something
+ like J-Sharp on Mono, you can write programs in Java, which than can run
+ on Mono. You do not need two bindings (like your example: GTK-Sharp _and_
+ Java-Gnome). You need only _one_ of it (GTK-Sharp). Thats the idea of Mono.
+ An other point is, that there are no people, who use Open Source-JVMs. They
+ all prefer Suns original. But for Unix there don't exist a .NET-Framework.
+ So it is possible, that in the future Mono is the standard .NET for Unixes.
+
+Q: Do you plan to implement a Javascript compiler?
+
+A: Yes. Eto Demerzal has started a Rhino port to C#.
+ After this is completed, we will begin developing
+ the JavaScript compiler.
+
<a name="extending"></a>
** Extending Mono
If you have innovative ideas, and want to create new classes, we
encourage you to make those classes operate correctly well in both
- Mono and .NET
+ Mono and .NET.
+
+Q: Is there any way I can develop the class libraries using Linux yet?
+
+A: Yes. Some class libraries can be developed on Linux. Search for
+ Paolo's post (he lists which classes can be compiled fine now).
+
+Q: Is there any way I can install a known working copy of mono in /usr,
+ and an experimental copy somewhere else, and have both copies use
+ their own libraries? (I'm still not very good at library paths in
+ Linux)
+
+A: Yes. Just use two installation prefixes.
+
<a name="portability"></a>
** Portability
Windows. We do not expect many Linux-isms in the code, so it
should be easy to port Mono to other UNIX variants.
-Q: What about Mono on non X-based systems?
+Q: What about Mono on non Linux-based systems?
A: Our main intention at Ximian is to be able to develop GNOME
applications with Mono, but if you are interested in providing a
- port of the Winform classes to other platforms (frame buffer or
+ port of the Winforms classes to other platforms (frame buffer or
MacOS X for example), we would gladly integrate them, as long
they are under an open source license.
-Q: Will Mono run on Windows?
+Q: What operating systems/CPUs do you support
+
+A: Mono currently runs on Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD.
+ There is a JIT engine available for x86 processors that can
+ generate code and optimizations tailored for a particular CPU.
+
+ Interpreters exist for the SPARC, PowerPC and StrongARM CPUs.
+
+Q: Does Mono run on Windows?
+
+A: Yes. You can get pre-compiled
+ binaries from <a href="http://www.go-mono.com/download.html">http://www.go-mono.com/download.html</a>
+
+Q: Does Mono run on Linux?
-A: Yes. Currently some parts of Mono only run on Windows
- (the C# compiler is a .NET executable) and other parts have only
- been compiled on Linux, and require Cygwin to compile on Windows.
+A: Yes. You can get pre-compiled
+ binaries from <a href="http://www.go-mono.com/download.html">http://www.go-mono.com/download.html</a>
Q: Will I require Cygwin to run mono?
-A: No. While you'll need it to compile it, it runs without cygwin and does not even require cygwin1.dll
+A: No. Cygwin is only required to build Mono.
Q: Will Mono depend on GNOME?
in Mono for implementing a `Hello World Enterprise P2P Web
Service', you will not need any GNOME components.
+Q: Is anyone working on porting Mono to IA-64?
+
+A: Nobody is working on such port.
+
+Q: If I were about to start a Mono port to IA-64,would the same lburg code
+ generator work for IA-64 also? or anything else need to be used for code
+ generation(as the processor architecture is totally different from IA32)
+
+A: The lburg approach can be use for any processor architecture. But you might
+ think in another better approach.
+
+Q: Do you plan to port Rhino to C#?.
+
+A: Eto Demerzal has started a Rhino port to C#.
+
+Q: Has anyone succeeded in building a Mac version of the C# environment.
+ If so can you explain how?
+
+A: You could try to check with the Darwin people, or the Fink people.
+ Mono/C# is self hosting on Linux/PPC which is the hard part, so it
+ should be relatively simple to get it to work on MacOS
+
<a name="reuse"></a>
** Reusing Existing Code
defined API that splits the JIT from the GC system and the actual
byte code implementation.
+ We are using some pieces of ORP (Their code generation interface)
+ and we use it as a source of inspiration for optimizations. Paolo
+ and Dietmar consider ORP as being one of the best JIT engines out
+ there (and their research work and papers are very useful if you are
+ interested in JIT technology).
+
Q: What about using GNU Lightning?
-A: We are also researching <a
- href="http://www.gnu.org/software/lightning/lightning.html">GNU
- Lightning</a>.
+A: We are not using GNU Lightning. Our JIT is using an instruction
+ selector based on tree-pattern matching, and a code generation
+ interface that is very tied to the current architecture.
+
+Q: Will I be able to use Microsoft SQL Server 2000 or will I need to switch
+ to a specific Open Source Database. Will I need to recode?
+
+A: There should not be any need to recode.
+
+Q: What do I need to watch out for when programming in VB.NET so that I'm
+ sure to be able to run those apps on Linux?
+
+A: Not making any PInvoke or DLL calls should and not using anything in
+ the Microsoft.* namespaces should suffice. Also do not use any
+ Methods/Classes marked as "This type/method supports the .NET Framework
+ infrastructure and is not intended to be used directly from your code."
+ even if you know what these classes/methods do.
+
+Q: Will built-in reporting be supported for crystal reports? This is a
+ heavily used part of our system.
+
+A: Probably not. Crystal Reports are propriety. Someone may try to emulate
+ the behavior, but no-one has yet volunteered.
+
+Q: Who about writing to the registry? As I understand it, Linux does not have
+ a counterpart to the registry. Should I avoid relying on that feature?
+
+A: Try to avoid it. Although there would be a emulation for registry in
+ Mono too. GNOME does have a registry like mechanism for configuration. But
+ Even if gnome has a configuration system similar to the registry, the keys
+ will not be equal, so you will probably end up having to do some runtime
+ detection, and depending on this load an assembly that has your
+ platform-specific hacks.
+
+Q: System.Data.SqlClient with FreeTDS, will you port parts of these to C# and
+ use them?
+
+A: if their license is compatible with mono's, yes, we'd think about porting
+ them. If not, we'll continue with the plan of using FreeTDS.
<a name="gcc"></a>
** Mono and GCC
-Q: Are you working on a GCC front-end to C#? A GCC backend that will
+Q: Are you working on a GCC front-end to C#? A GCC back-end that will
generate CIL images? What about making a front-end to GCC that
takes CIL images and generates native code?
href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html">MIT X11</a>
license.
+ The Mono runtime and the Mono C# Compiler are also available under
+ a proprietary license for those who can not use the LGPL and the
+ GPL in their code.
+
+ For licensing details, contact <a
+ href="mailto:mono-licensing@ximian.com">mono-licensing@ximian.com</a>
+
+
Q: I would like to contribute code to Mono under a particular
license. What licenses will you accept?
but as a general rule, we will accept the code under the same
terms of the "container" module.
-<a name="patents></a>
+Q: Is the Mono
+
+
+<a name="patents"></a>
** Patents
Q: Could patents be used to completely disable Mono (either submarine
A: No. First, its basic functional capabilities have pre-existed too
long to be held up by patents. The basic components of Mono are
technologically equivalent to Sun's Java technology, which has been
- around for years. Mono will also implement multi-language and
+ around for years.
+
+ Mono will also implement multi-language and
multi-architecture support, but there are previous technologies
such as UCSD p-code and ANDF that also support multiple languages
using a common intermediate language. The libraries are similar
open source software community with good development tools, which
is the primary reason for developing Mono.
-<a name="etc"></a> **
-Miscellaneous Questions
+<a name="etc"></a>
+** Miscellaneous Questions
Q: You say that the CLI allows multiple languages to execute on the
same environment. Isn't this the purpose of CORBA?
CLI allows "data-level interoperability" because every
language/component uses the same data layout and memory management.
- This means you can operate directly upon the datatypes that someone
+ This means you can operate directly upon the data types that someone
else provides, without having to go via their interfaces. It also
- means you don't have to "marshall" (convert) parameters (data
+ means you don't have to "marshal" (convert) parameters (data
layouts are the same, so you can just pass components directly) and
- you don't have to worry about memory managment, because all
+ you don't have to worry about memory management, because all
languages/components share the same garbage collector and address
space. This means much less copying and no need for reference
counting.
A: It's possible. But there is no plan about this. So the short answer is no.
+Q: Are there any Boehm's GC binaries?
+
+A: Yes. You can find RPMs <a href="http://java.thn.htu.se/~toor/">here</a>, though
+ if your distribution provides the correct packages, you should use those.
+ The suggested version of the Boehm GC is 6.1.
+
+Q: How can I report a bug?
+
+A: The best thing is to track down the bug and provide a simple test to
+ reproduce the bug. You can then add the bug to the
+ <a href="http://bugzilla.ximian.com/enter_bug.cgi">bugtracking system</a>.
+
+ Please provide information about what version of mono you're using
+ and any relevant details to be able to reproduce the bug. Note that
+ bugs reported on the mailing-list may be easily forgotten, so it's
+ better to file them in the <a href="http://bugzilla.ximian.com/enter_bug.cgi">bug tracking system</a>.
+
+Q: Does mcs support the same command line options as the MS C#
+ compiler?
+
+A: The Mono C# compiler now supports the same command line
+ arguments as the Microsoft C# compiler does.
+
+Q: How about getting searchable archives on lists.ximian.com?
+
+A: You can perform a search on the mono-related mailing lists
+ <a href="http://www.go-mono.com/mailing-lists.html">here</a>.
+
+Q: When using mono from cvs or from a snapshot, I get an error messaage
+ saying that Mono and the runtime are out of sync. How do I fix that?
+
+A: If you use mono from cvs, you need to be prepared for changes in the
+ runtime internals. This means that you should keep a working setup
+ before blindling updating (a working setup may just be the last released
+ tarball or a recent binary snapshot).
+ Usually, compiling corlib with mcs before recompiling the C runtime does
+ the right thing (but occasionally you may need to do it the other
+ way around).
+
+
+
+<a name="problems"></a>
+** Mono Common Problems
+
+ If you are having problems compiling or running Mono software
+ or if you think that you found a bug, etc. Please visit the
+ <a href="http://geneura.ugr.es/~jaime/deploy/mono-common-problems.html">Mono Common Problems</a> document and try there.
+
projects / mono.git / blobdiff