/* 2004.12 yhlu add dual core support */ #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include static int disable_siblings = !CONFIG_LOGICAL_CPUS; #include "dualcore_id.c" static int get_max_siblings(int nodes) { device_t dev; int nodeid; int siblings=0; //get max siblings from all the nodes for(nodeid=0; nodeid> 12) & 3; if(siblings < j) { siblings = j; } } return siblings; } static void enable_apic_ext_id(int nodes) { device_t dev; int nodeid; //enable APIC_EXIT_ID all the nodes for(nodeid=0; nodeid>4) & 7) + 1; siblings = get_max_siblings(nodes); if(bsp_apic_id > 0) { // io apic could start from 0 return 0; } else if(pci_read_config32(dev, 0x68) & ( (1<<17) | (1<<18)) ) { // enabled ext id but bsp = 0 return 1; } nb_cfg_54 = read_nb_cfg_54(); #if 0 //it is for all e0 single core and nc_cfg_54 low is set, but in the romstage.c stage we do not set that bit for it. if(nb_cfg_54 && (!disable_siblings) && (siblings == 0)) { //we need to check if e0 single core is there int i; for(i=0; i0) ) { /* for 8 way dual core, we will used up apicid 16:16, actualy 16 is not allowed by current kernel and the kernel will try to get one that is small than 16 to make io apic work. I don't know when the kernel can support 256 apic id. (APIC_EXT_ID is enabled) */ //4:10 for two way 8:12 for four way 16:16 for eight way //Use CONFIG_MAX_PHYSICAL_CPUS instead of nodes for better consistency? apicid_base = nb_cfg_54 ? (siblings+1) * nodes : 8 * siblings + nodes; } else { apicid_base = nodes; } if((apicid_base+ioapic_num-1)>0xf) { // We need to enable APIC EXT ID printk_info("if the IO APIC device doesn't support 256 apic id, \r\n you need to set CONFIG_ENABLE_APIC_EXT_ID in romstage.c so you can spare 16 id for ioapic\r\n"); enable_apic_ext_id(nodes); } return apicid_base; } #if 0 static int first_time = 1; void amd_sibling_init(device_t cpu) { unsigned i, siblings; struct cpuid_result result; unsigned nb_cfg_54; struct node_core_id id; /* On the bootstrap processor see if I want sibling cpus enabled */ if (first_time) { first_time = 0; get_option(&disable_siblings, "dual_core"); } result = cpuid(0x80000008); /* See how many sibling cpus we have */ /* Is dualcore supported */ siblings = (result.ecx & 0xff); if ( siblings < 1) { return; } #if 1 printk_debug("CPU: %u %d siblings\n", cpu->path.apic.apic_id, siblings); #endif nb_cfg_54 = read_nb_cfg_54(); #if 1 id = get_node_core_id(nb_cfg_54); // pre e0 nb_cfg_54 can not be set /* See if I am a sibling cpu */ //if ((cpu->path.apic.apic_id>>(nb_cfg_54?0:3)) & siblings ) { // siblings = 1, 3, 7, 15,.... //if ( ( (cpu->path.apic.apic_id>>(nb_cfg_54?0:3)) % (siblings+1) ) != 0 ) { if(id.coreid != 0) { if (disable_siblings) { cpu->enabled = 0; } return; } #endif /* I am the primary cpu start up my siblings */ for(i = 1; i <= siblings; i++) { struct device_path cpu_path; device_t new; /* Build the cpu device path */ cpu_path.type = DEVICE_PATH_APIC; cpu_path.apic.apic_id = cpu->path.apic.apic_id + i * (nb_cfg_54?1:8); if(id.nodeid == 0) { // need some special processing, because may the bsp is not lifted, but the core1 is lifted //defined in northbridge.c if(sysconf.enabled_apic_ext_id && (!sysconf.lift_bsp_apicid)) { cpu->path.apic.apic_id += sysconf.apicid_offset; } } /* See if I can find the cpu */ new = find_dev_path(cpu->bus, &cpu_path); /* Allocate the new cpu device structure */ if(!new) { new = alloc_dev(cpu->bus, &cpu_path); new->enabled = 1; new->initialized = 0; } new->path.apic.node_id = cpu->path.apic.node_id; new->path.apic.core_id = i; #if 1 printk_debug("CPU: %u has sibling %u\n", cpu->path.apic.apic_id, new->path.apic.apic_id); #endif if(new->enabled && !new->initialized) start_cpu(new); } } #endif